Made a prompt you are proud of?
Join the exclusive AI Recruiter Club and receive a swag bag, get your prompt featured with full credit across our library, newsletter, and socials.

Act like a Quality Improvement Specialist.
Help me build an Ishikawa (Fishbone) Diagram to diagnose the root causes impacting the effectiveness of my candidate sourcing channels.
I want to evaluate sourcing platforms [LinkedIn, Instahyre, GitHub, etc]. based on parameters such as:
Cost per hire
Time to hire
Candidate quality
Diversity of candidates
Conversion rates (views → applications → interviews → offers → joins)
[Add any other sourcing metric you recommend.]
Here’s some context to help you analyze better:
I’m a recruiter at a [Fortune 500 / startup/product company / etc.]
The roles I’m hiring for are mainly [e.g., tech/sales / design / mid-senior roles]
I source candidates across [X] number of platforms
My key goal is to [e.g., reduce sourcing cost, improve diversity, increase quality hires]
Instructions:
Identify the main branches (e.g., Tools/Channels, Process, People, Measurement, Environment, Strategy)
Break down each with possible sub-causes for why sourcing is/ isn’t effective
Highlight relationships or dependencies
Provide insights on how I can improve sourcing effectiveness across these channels
Suggest any preventive actions to avoid recurring issues
Lastly, convert it into a fishbone diagram
Sourcing channel effectiveness Prompt
The Prompt
Act like a Quality Improvement Specialist.
Help me build an Ishikawa (Fishbone) Diagram to diagnose the root causes impacting the effectiveness of my candidate sourcing channels.
I want to evaluate sourcing platforms [LinkedIn, Instahyre, GitHub, etc]. based on parameters such as:
Cost per hire
Time to hire
Candidate quality
Diversity of candidates
Conversion rates (views → applications → interviews → offers → joins)
[Add any other sourcing metric you recommend.]
Here’s some context to help you analyze better:
I’m a recruiter at a [Fortune 500 / startup/product company / etc.]
The roles I’m hiring for are mainly [e.g., tech/sales / design / mid-senior roles]
I source candidates across [X] number of platforms
My key goal is to [e.g., reduce sourcing cost, improve diversity, increase quality hires]
Instructions:
Identify the main branches (e.g., Tools/Channels, Process, People, Measurement, Environment, Strategy)
Break down each with possible sub-causes for why sourcing is/ isn’t effective
Highlight relationships or dependencies
Provide insights on how I can improve sourcing effectiveness across these channels
Suggest any preventive actions to avoid recurring issues
Lastly, convert it into a fishbone diagram
- Prompt Tip
Copy, customize, and plug these into ChatGPT or your favorite AI writing tool. Each one comes with fill-in-the-blanks so you can tailor it to your own voice, industry, and candidate pool.
Other Popular Prompts
engagement
- 1430 views
Diagnose Sourcing Channel Effectiveness with a Fishbone Diagram
Uncover what’s hurting your sourcing ROI, from cost per hire to conversion drop‑offs, with this prompt‑powered root‑cause analysis.

Harshita Gakkhar
5 Min Read
Offer
- 2149 views
Prevent Offer Drop-Offs Before They Happen (AI Risk Score Prompt)
Offer declined again? This prompt helps you predict drop-offs before they happen and gives you a clear plan to fix them fast and permanently.

Harshita Gakkhar
5 Min Read
Sourcing
- 2027 views
Cold Email Prompts That Actually Get Replies (GAIT Framework)
Skip generic outreach. Use this 3‑part prompt sequence to write emails that feel personal, relevant, and impossible to ignore. Or is it?
